0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±âº»°£È£ÇÐȸÁö °ÔÀç ³í¹®ÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä¾î¿Í MeSH ¿ë¾îÀÇ ºñ±³(2003-2007³â)

Comparison of Key Words of the Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing with MeSH (2003-2007)

±âº»°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2008³â 15±Ç 4È£ p.558 ~ 565
KMID : 0388320080150040558
Á¤½Â±³ ( Chaung Seung-Kyo ) - ¼¼¸í´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

¼Û°æ¾Ö ( Sohng Kyeong-Yae ) - °¡Å縯´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
±è°æÈñ ( Kim Kyung-Hee ) - Áß¾Ó´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze how accurately authors of the Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing used MeSH terms as key words.

Method: A total of 724 key words used in the 225 papers of Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing from 2003 to 2007 were compared with MeSH terms.

Results: Fifty nine point eight percent of total key words were completely coincident with MeSH terms, 13.5% were entry terms, and 21.8% were not MeSH terms. The coincidence rates for 2003 and 2007 separately were 38.5% and 70.9%. Also, 25.3% of papers precisely used MeSH terms as key words and 8% did not use any MeSH terms.

Conclusion: The results show that the coincidence rate of key words with MeSH terms was at a moderate level and gradually increased according to year. However, there is a need for us to understand MeSH more specifically and accurately.
KeyWords
ÁÖ¿ä¾î
Medical subject headings, MeSH
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed